Sports

Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds To Reassess Russia Stance

Škoda, main sponsor of ice hockey worlds, will reassess its involvement if Russia plays the 2027 tournament in Germany as the IIHF weighs a CAS ruling.

Published

24 seconds ago

November 4, 2026

James Williams

Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds To Reassess Russia Stance

Škoda Auto’s most consequential move as the main sponsor of ice hockey worlds was never a cheque. It was a warning. In 2021 the Czech automaker said it would withdraw its backing of the championship if Belarus stayed on as co-host alongside Latvia. The IIHF stripped Belarus of the hosting rights, and the tournament was played in Latvia alone.

The company is running the same play again. On Wednesday, Škoda said it would “reassess” its involvement in the men’s world championship if Russia is allowed to compete, describing a Russian return as “incompatible with the values we have consistently upheld.”

The trigger is a Court of Arbitration for Sport ruling last week that obliged the IIHF to lift its exclusion of Russian national teams, in place since 2022 over the war in Ukraine. The case followed an appeal by the Russian Ice Hockey Federation. The IIHF said the practical impact of that ruling was “significantly underestimated” and that it is still deciding how to respond.

Table of Contents

Why The Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds Has Credibility Here

Škoda is not a logo leased for a fortnight. It has backed the flagship event since 1992 as a mobility partner and has held the title of Official Main Sponsor since 1993, a run of 33 consecutive years that the company documents itself in its official sponsorship releases. Its imprint is operational, not just financial: 53 all-electric Elroq and Enyaq vehicles supplied to organisers for the 2026 tournament in Zurich and Fribourg, plus a Most Valuable Player trophy of hand-blown Czech crystal produced by Lasvit and designed in-house.

The money is the one number nobody will attach to it. Škoda spokeswoman Ivana Povolna declined to specify the annual spend when asked by AFP. The company’s 2025 annual report quantifies the relationship in hardware, listing 45 electric cars lent to organisers, and in design work on the MVP trophy.

That asymmetry matters for how the threat should be read. The pressure is reputational and logistical, not a figure an auditor can check. What is established: Škoda has stated a conditional reassessment. What is analysis, not fact: whether a withdrawal would hurt the IIHF more than it hurts Škoda. Neither side has published a contract term.

What The Verified Record Says About Sponsor Pressure

Škoda is not alone, and the queue formed quickly. Workwear maker Strauss will “forgo all logo exposure associated with the tournament” and is “considering withdrawing as a sponsor,” CEO Henning Strauss said. Nokian Tyres said it would end its backing if Russia takes part. AJ Products, a tournament sponsor since 1989, asked for its logo not to be shown.

The national federations moved first. Finland, Sweden, Czechia, Norway, Denmark and Latvia have said they will play the tournament but not games against Russia, a boycott Al Jazeera tracked as it spread. Austria became the seventh late Tuesday; its federation CEO Alexander Helwig told broadcaster ORF that “as of now, we would certainly not play against Russia,” per ESPN.

Seven of 16 nations is not a fringe position. It is close to half the field refusing a fixture. Canada extended the pressure beyond the senior tournament: Prime Minister Mark Carney said Russia and Belarus will be barred from the World Junior Championship in Alberta beginning December 26. Russian ambassador Oleg Stepanov told TASS that Canada was “bringing politics even into junior hockey.” The Finnish city of Turku has threatened to drop hosting duties for the 2028 World Junior Championship.

The IIHF’s own language concedes the squeeze. It cited “visa and entry requirements, security provisions, logistical constraints and consequences for competition formats, all compounded by the limited time available, with some events only weeks away.”

The Format Problem That Makes Hockey Different From Football

Hockey’s top division has no qualifying route that can absorb a late entrant. The championship runs 16 teams in two groups of eight, with the two weakest relegated each year. The 2027 groups in Germany have already been drawn without Russia: Group A holds Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Latvia, Slovenia and Ukraine; Group B holds Canada, the United States, Czechia, Slovakia, Denmark, Norway, Hungary and Kazakhstan, per Nasha Niva’s breakdown of the field.

Russia would therefore enter as a ninth team in a group, or displace a qualifier such as Ukraine or Kazakhstan. That is the “consequences for competition formats” the IIHF pointed to. It is a scheduling problem in a way that a European football qualifying group is not.

Russian Sports Minister Mikhail Degtyarev said via TASS that he expected Russia to be awarded wins if nations forfeit. That is a stated expectation, not a confirmed rule. The source material contains no IIHF competition regulation establishing that forfeited games would be recorded as Russian victories, and the federation has not said so publicly.

Contract Status: Reassess Is Not Withdraw

Škoda’s wording is conditional. “If the Russian national team takes part in the tournament, we will reassess our involvement in the tournament and take further action” is not a termination notice. Strauss sits closer to a partial exit. Nokian Tyres stated an outright end to backing. Three gradations of one pressure campaign, and none of them a signed withdrawal.

The IIHF said it is “carefully analyzing the scenarios” and remains in dialogue with national associations, host authorities and organisers.

Future Outlook For The Tournament And Its Backers

The decision point lands before May. The IIHF must reconcile a CAS ruling it disagrees with, a 16-team field already drawn, and a bloc of hosts and sponsors that has publicly set terms. For the main sponsor of ice hockey worlds, the 2021 Belarus precedent is the relevant one: a public conditional threat, then a federation decision that removed the objection. Whether that sequence repeats in Germany depends on a scenario analysis the IIHF has not published, and on a contract value Škoda has never disclosed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will Škoda definitely withdraw as main sponsor of the ice hockey worlds?

No. Škoda said it would “reassess” its involvement and “take further action” if Russia plays. That is conditional language, not a termination. Spokeswoman Ivana Povolna also declined to specify how much the company spends annually on the tournament.

Why is Russia eligible for IIHF events again?

A Court of Arbitration for Sport ruling last week obliged the IIHF to lift its exclusion of Russian national teams, which had been in place since 2022 over the war in Ukraine. The case followed an appeal by the Russian Ice Hockey Federation. The IIHF has said it disagrees with the outcome and is still deciding how to react.

Which countries are refusing to play Russia at the men’s world championship?

Finland, Sweden, Czechia, Norway, Denmark, Latvia and Austria have all said they will not play games against Russia. That is seven of the 16 nations in the top division. Canada has separately barred Russia and Belarus from the World Junior Championship in Alberta.

Can Russia simply be added to the 2027 tournament in Germany?

Not without a format change. The 16 teams are split into two groups of eight and the 2027 groups have already been drawn without Russia. Russia would have to enter as a ninth team in a group or displace a qualifier such as Ukraine or Kazakhstan.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for main sponsor of ice hockey worlds and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds To Reassess Russia Stance, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA:

About James Williams

James Williams is the Content Director at AfriLatest. With a background in journalism and a love for storytelling, he curates compelling content and multimedia that resonates with global readers. James is dedicated to maintaining AfriLatest as a trusted source for daily news, sports updates, and entertainment trends.

View all articles by James Williams

Don't Miss

Dylan Larkin Trade: Red Wings Suspend Center, Seek Deal

Click to comment

Football

AFCON Two-Year Cycle Restored: What CAF’s U-Turn Means

CAF has restored the AFCON two-year cycle after a unanimous EXCO vote. The money, the calendar gaps, and what it means for Nigeria and Africa.

Published

4 days ago

October 31, 2026

James Williams

AFCON Two-Year Cycle Restored: What CAF's U-Turn Means

The Confederation of African Football has restored the AFCON two-year cycle, less than a year after announcing it would abandon it. The CAF Executive Committee approved the reversal unanimously, and president Patrice Motsepe confirmed the decision on Thursday, 29 October 2026, after the confederation’s Strategy Conference in Cabo Verde on 7–9 October.

The principals are not two clubs and an agent. They are CAF, its 54 member associations, and — by CAF’s own account — the African players employed by clubs outside the continent. The 2027 TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations stays with Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.

Why CAF Reversed Course On The AFCON Two-Year Cycle

AFCON two-year cycle

The stated reason is the timing of money, not nostalgia. CAF had planned an Africa Nations League to run every two years and replace AFCON, which it intended to move to a four-year schedule. That plan was announced in December 2025.

By October, CAF’s assessment had changed. The confederation concluded the Nations League would need several years before it could generate the resources to make African football’s competitions globally competitive and financially self-sustaining.

Motsepe’s explanation, published on CAF’s website, put the member associations at the centre: “The decision by the CAF EXCO that the CAF AFCON should take place every Two Years was based on advancing, protecting and promoting the interest of African Football and CAF’s 54 Member Associations, as well as the interest of African players employed by Football Clubs outside Africa.

He added: “We were also concerned by the several years required before the proposed new Africa Nations League Pan-African competition … could make the substantial financial and football development contributions for African Football and CAF competitions to be globally competitive and self-supporting.” The announcement was carried by Punch alongside CAF’s own statement.

The Money Question CAF Would Not Defer

Read plainly, the reversal is a hedging decision. AFCON is a revenue engine that exists now. The Nations League was a bet on revenue that would arrive later. CAF chose to keep the engine running while leaving the bet on the table.

That matters because the four-year plan had high-level backing. FIFA president Gianni Infantino urged CAF to move AFCON to a four-year cycle in early 2020, and in December 2025 Motsepe announced exactly that, as ESPN reported. CAF this week also reaffirmed its support for Infantino despite outcry over botched plans for a FIFA commercial subsidiary managed with private investors. The reversal is therefore a rare case of CAF setting its calendar against the stated preference of the FIFA president.

What The Published Calendar Actually Says

The restored biennial format, as published, does not produce a two-yearly tournament. CAF’s confirmed editions are 2027, 2028, 2031 and 2033. The step from 2028 to 2031 is three years.

CAF’s justification is the World Cup. In line with FIFA tradition, continental national-team finals should not fall in a World Cup year, and the 2030 tournament is the constraint. Morocco World News noted that the announced dates mean some editions will be separated by three years despite the biennial label.

This is the part of the story that changes how the decision should be read. The guarantee CAF has given its members is not a fixed two-year rhythm. It is a fixture list in which the gaps are dictated by FIFA’s calendar.

What It Means For Nigeria And The Super Eagles

AFCON two-year cycle

For Nigeria, the gain is structural rather than immediate. A flagship continental finals retained on the calendar keeps qualifying windows, broadcast inventory and sponsorship value in place — the assets the Nigeria Football Federation plans around. A four-year AFCON would have thinned all three while the Nations League found its feet.

The 2027 host arrangement is the other variable. Motsepe said he was confident Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda would deliver, while acknowledging problems in venue preparations that he said would be addressed. His reference point was Cameroon, the 2021 host that was widely doubted before the tournament and, in his account, delivered.

The unsigned element is 2028. The bidding process for that edition is underway, according to ESPN’s reporting, which means the second instalment of the restored cycle currently has no host. Nothing about that is complete, and it should not be described as settled.

How Likely Is The AFCON Two-Year Cycle To Hold?

Near-term, close to certain. The vote was unanimous, the announcement is official, and the decision protects CAF’s most bankable asset. Nothing in the current record supports a second reversal before 2028.

Medium-term, less settled. The Nations League has been demoted, not cancelled, and the 2028 host is unresolved. If a future CAF leadership revisits the Nations League as a revenue source, the four-year argument returns with it. That is speculation and should be labelled as such — no source in CAF’s statement points to a renewed review.

Read as a business decision, the AFCON two-year cycle is CAF buying time: keeping the tournament that pays for African football while it waits to see whether a replacement can ever pay for itself. For Nigeria and the other 53 member associations, the practical instruction is to plan qualifying and squad cycles against published dates, not against the word biennial.

Frequently Asked Questions

When is the next Africa Cup of Nations?

The next TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations is scheduled for 2027, hosted jointly by Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. CAF has confirmed subsequent editions for 2028, 2031 and 2033.

Does the two-year cycle mean AFCON is played every two years without exception?

No. The published editions are 2027, 2028, 2031 and 2033. CAF says continental national-team finals should not be staged in a World Cup year, and the 2030 World Cup creates a three-year gap between the 2028 and 2031 tournaments.

Why did CAF reverse its four-year AFCON plan?

CAF said the proposed Africa Nations League, which was meant to run every two years as a replacement, would take several years to generate the money needed to make its competitions globally competitive and financially self-sustaining. The Executive Committee voted unanimously to keep AFCON biennial.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for AFCON two-year cycle and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – AFCON Two-Year Cycle Restored: What CAF’s U-Turn Means, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA:

About James Williams

View all articles by James Williams

Sports

Dylan Larkin Trade: Red Wings Suspend Center, Seek Deal

Detroit suspended Dylan Larkin without pay after he refused to play. What the Dylan Larkin trade standoff costs, and why the return matters most.

Published

5 days ago

October 30, 2026

James Williams

Dylan Larkin Trade: Red Wings Suspend Center, Seek Deal

Dylan Larkin never owned a signature move in the highlight-reel sense. His signature was availability. Eight hundred eighteen games in a Red Wings sweater, 649 points, 278 goals, 371 assists, tenth on the all-time scoring list of a franchise that has existed since 1926.

On Thursday, Oct. 29, the availability ended. Larkin told Detroit he would no longer play for the organization, and the club suspended him without pay, a sequence first reported by ESPN and detailed by ClickOnDetroit.

The Clock Inside The Dylan Larkin Trade Standoff

Every trade saga wants a deadline. This one has a metronome. Larkin forfeits $41,000 in salary for each day of the suspension, a figure that traces directly to his $8.7 million average annual value — the fourth season of an eight-year, $69.6 million contract.

That number is the only hard, checkable fact in a story otherwise built on positioning. Both sides call talks ongoing. Neither has produced a return, a timeline, or a confirmed list of bidders.

The no-trade clause is the structural problem, not a matter of interpretation. Larkin controls his destination. He expanded his approved list from three teams to 10, as reported by ESPN and confirmed in local reporting. Ten teams is still a fraction of the league, and an $8.7 million cap charge has to fit somewhere.

“With the teams that Dylan has on his list, it’s difficult to get something done,” interim general manager Shawn Horcoff said, per NHL.com. “I’m prepared to wait as long as necessary to make sure that the return that we get is something that is good for the Red Wings overall.”

Why Detroit’s Return Package Is The Real Question

Reading the suspension as punishment gets the mechanics backwards. It functions as price protection. A player who refuses to report has no hold over the clock; a team that trades him cheaply surrenders the only asset it holds.

Horcoff said he wants players who can help Detroit immediately but is open to every format of deal. “A trade like this, there are significant challenges when you’re trying to put a salary like Dylan’s into a team,” he said. “Really, we’re just trying to find something that is fair for a return for someone of Dylan’s caliber.”

Larkin’s side has its own record. Agent Pat Brisson told The Athletic that “Dylan’s had enough of the situation” and that the camp believes he has “been very professional and cooperative through this process.” Horcoff’s account of the same morning is a phone call saying Larkin was not coming to the rink. The distance between those two descriptions is where the dispute actually lives, and no public document settles it.

The verified timeline does explain the frustration. Larkin requested a trade in June after clashing with then-GM Steve Yzerman. Yzerman was fired July 15. Detroit still has no permanent head of hockey operations. Larkin reported to camp anyway, was stripped of a captaincy he held six seasons, opened the year on injured reserve with an upper-body injury, then returned Oct. 6 with a goal and an assist in a 5-3 win over Ottawa. He exits this chapter with two goals and six points in 10 games, after five straight seasons above 67 points and six 30-goal campaigns.

Detroit’s Record Without Their Former Captain

The Red Wings are 5-1-3 in their past nine games, including a 4-1 win over Chicago hours after the suspension. Moritz Seider said the victory “meant a little more” because “this is our squad,” and hoped the exit “eliminates a little bit of noise.” Alex DeBrincat was blunt: “It’s his decision. We’re happy with the guys who are here.”

Coach Todd McLellan: “We’re moving on. This has been going on for too long.” Those are the words of a room choosing subtraction over friction. They are not proof Detroit is better without a six-time 30-goal scorer, because nine games cannot prove that.

The playoff history explains the request better than any quote. Larkin’s only postseason experience is five games in 2015-16, his rookie season. Detroit has missed the playoffs 10 consecutive seasons, the longest drought in franchise history and the longest active one in the NHL. ESPN also notes he was part of the U.S. team that won Olympic gold in February.

One more complication for any buyer: defenseman Simon Edvinsson, a restricted free agent, remains unsigned and has requested a trade of his own.

What The Dylan Larkin Trade Will Actually Be Judged On

The suspension buys Detroit time it may not be able to spend well. Waiting costs $41,000 a day in forfeited salary, not cap space, and it hardens a locker room that has already decided to move on.

A Dylan Larkin trade will be graded on return, not speed. If Horcoff converts a 30-year-old first-line center on a known contract into immediate roster help, the standoff becomes a footnote. If he waits into the season and accepts futures to end the noise, the wait was theater. Larkin, 30, controls the list; Detroit controls the price. Whichever side blinks first, the clock is public and the result will be measurable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Detroit Red Wings suspend Dylan Larkin?

Larkin informed the team on Thursday, Oct. 29 that he would no longer play for the organization. Detroit suspended him without pay the same day. Interim GM Shawn Horcoff said the club received a call from Larkin’s agent saying the center was not coming to the rink.

How much salary does Dylan Larkin forfeit during the suspension?

Larkin forfeits $41,000 per day, according to ESPN. That figure derives from his $8.7 million average annual value on an eight-year, $69.6 million contract now in its fourth season.

How many teams are on Dylan Larkin’s approved trade list?

Larkin has a no-trade clause and reportedly expanded his list of acceptable destinations from three teams to 10. Horcoff said the limited list makes completing a deal difficult because any trade also has to fit an $8.7 million cap charge.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for Dylan Larkin trade and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – Dylan Larkin Trade: Red Wings Suspend Center, Seek Deal, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA:

About James Williams

View all articles by James Williams

Sports

Alex Caruso Ankle Sprain Leaves Thunder Thin at Guard

An Alex Caruso ankle sprain ruled him out of the Thunder’s win over Phoenix, hours after Jalen Williams and Cason Wallace were sent for surgery.

Published

1 week ago

October 27, 2026

James Williams

Alex Caruso Ankle Sprain Leaves Thunder Thin at Guard

Alex Caruso was ruled out of Monday night’s 125-114 win over the Phoenix Suns with a right ankle sprain, making him the third Oklahoma City Thunder rotation player lost to injury in roughly 24 hours.

The Alex Caruso ankle sprain occurred with 1:34 left in the second quarter and the Thunder leading 61-47. Caruso rotated into help defense to contest a Dillon Brooks drive; Brooks jump-stopped and his right foot collided with the inside of Caruso’s right ankle, according to Yahoo Sports. Caruso walked to the locker room, limping. He finished with nine points, three assists and two rebounds in a little over nine minutes.

After the game, coach Mark Daigneault said the injury was an ankle sprain and “nothing else,” ESPN reported. That is a same-night assessment from the sideline, not imaging. The team has not published a return timeline, and Daigneault did not offer one.

What The Alex Caruso Ankle Sprain Does And Does Not Establish

Confirmed: Caruso did not return to the game. Confirmed: Oklahoma City described it as a right ankle sprain and nothing beyond that on the night. Confirmed: the Thunder won without him, and without Chet Holmgren, and without starters Jalen Williams and Cason Wallace.

Not confirmed: how many games Caruso misses. Not confirmed: whether imaging changes the diagnosis. The gap between those two categories is the whole story of the Thunder’s week, because the same evening’s earlier news involved surgeries with no announced dates attached.

Two Starters Were Sent To Surgery Before Tip-Off

Earlier Monday, general manager Sam Presti announced that Williams suffered a fractured fibula and dislocated left ankle in Sunday’s 108-101 win over the LA Clippers, and that Wallace tore the labrum in his left shoulder. Both will undergo surgery, ESPN reported. Presti said return timelines would be known only after the operations.

Williams was fouled on a drive and landed awkwardly with 1:14 left in that game. His left leg collapsed and his ankle bent at an unnatural angle. He was stretchered off to a standing ovation and raised two thumbs. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander bent down beside him, face buried in his jersey. Wallace went down in the first quarter after running into a moving screen by Clippers center Isaiah Jackson.

Both injuries typically require multiple months of rehabilitation, putting the availability of both players in doubt for the rest of the season. Neither has been formally ruled out for the year by the team.

Williams’ history makes the latest diagnosis harder to read. He played the entire 2025 playoff run with a torn ligament in his right shooting wrist, scoring 40 points in Game 5 of the Finals against Indiana, then had surgery. The recovery cost him the first 19 games of last season; hamstring strains limited him to 33 regular-season games and he sat out 10 of Oklahoma City’s 15 playoff games.

A Depth Chart Thinned By Cost Control

The Thunder did not arrive at this week carrying spare wings. Oklahoma City traded Luguentz Dort to the Atlanta Hawks in a cost-cutting move over the summer, and also moved Aaron Wiggins and Isaiah Joe in financially motivated transactions, per Yahoo Sports. Wallace had moved into the starting lineup largely because Dort left.

That is the structural layer of the story, and it is the part a single injury report cannot show. A roster built to compete now while managing financial pressure has little margin for simultaneous perimeter absences. Caruso, 32, was the obvious candidate for extra minutes once Williams and Wallace were lost. Now his own availability is unresolved.

The money is committed either way. Williams is in the first season of a five-year, $239 million maximum contract signed after Oklahoma City’s championship. Wallace signed a five-year, $139 million extension last week. Both deals are guaranteed. Neither helps on the floor in November.

What Presti Said, And What He Did Not Say

Presti, speaking at the Paycom Center, did not project a return date for either player and did not address roster moves. “We’ll wrap our arms around these guys,” he said. “We’ll get them back, we’ll get them healthy, but we got a lot of basketball to play in front of us.”

He added: “Not going to sit up here and say this is exactly where we want to be or this is how we’d like to have it, but at the same time, we are extremely optimistic about the recovery for both players.” He also said things could have been a lot worse.

The 4-0 start has been carried by replacements. Ajay Mitchell, starting for Williams, scored a career-high 30 points on 10-for-16 shooting in 25 minutes. Jared McCain, starting for Wallace, added 18 with four 3-pointers. Gilgeous-Alexander scored 26, while Isaiah Hartenstein (15 points, 13 rebounds) and Aday Mara (11 and 11) both posted double-doubles.

Holmgren sat out with patellar tendinitis in his right knee. He has no announced timeline either.

What To Watch

Three things. First, the surgical outcomes and post-operative timelines for Williams and Wallace. Presti said those would follow the operations, and they are the only reliable basis for judging whether either returns this season. Second, Caruso’s status for the next game; a sprain described on Monday night as nothing else can still cost a week or more once swelling is assessed.

Third, the roster question. Oklahoma City now lists several unavailable players, and the front office must decide whether to absorb the absences internally or add a body. Any decision will be constrained by the same financial calculations that thinned the wing rotation in the first place.

The competitive context is not neutral. John Hollinger of The Athletic wrote, as flagged by Hoops Rumors, that the injuries — Williams’ especially — could significantly change the shape of the Western Conference, which had looked like a two-team race between Oklahoma City and San Antonio. The Thunder survived Holmgren’s broken pelvic bone in 2024/25 because he returned for the playoffs and played a major role. That precedent depends on a return, not on depth.

For now the firm facts are procedural. Williams and Wallace are headed for surgery. Holmgren is out with knee tendinitis. Caruso has no announced timeline. The Alex Caruso ankle sprain will be judged by what follows it, not by how it looked as he walked off the floor.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long will Alex Caruso be out with the ankle sprain?

No timeline has been announced. Coach Mark Daigneault said after Monday’s win over Phoenix that it was an ankle sprain and ‘nothing else,’ but that was a same-night assessment rather than an imaging result. The team has not issued a return date.

What injuries will keep Jalen Williams and Cason Wallace out?

General manager Sam Presti said Williams suffered a fractured fibula and dislocated left ankle in Sunday’s win over the Clippers, and Wallace tore the labrum in his left shoulder. Both require surgery, and Presti said return timelines would be known only after the operations.

Did the Thunder win without their injured starters?

Yes. Oklahoma City beat Phoenix 125-114 on Monday to move to 4-0, with Ajay Mitchell scoring a career-high 30 points in place of Williams and Jared McCain adding 18 in place of Wallace. Chet Holmgren also sat out with patellar tendinitis.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for Alex Caruso ankle sprain and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – Alex Caruso Ankle Sprain Leaves Thunder Thin at Guard, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA: