Sports

Rangers Put Reimer on Waivers After One Start In Net

Rangers place Reimer on waivers after one start, a crease reshuffle that reveals where New York’s playoff line really sits this season.

Published

22 hours ago

November 7, 2026

James Williams

Rangers Put Reimer on Waivers After One Start In Net

The New York Rangers placed goaltender James Reimer on waivers Thursday. Read as a transaction, it is housekeeping. Read as a standings document, it is the clearest public evidence yet of how the Rangers intend to survive a season without Igor Shesterkin.

The verified sequence, per TSN: New York signed Reimer, 38, to a one-year, $850,000 contract on Oct. 25, after Shesterkin injured his knee early in the campaign and required season-ending surgery. Reimer started once, on Oct. 26 against Los Angeles, allowed three goals on eight shots, and was pulled after the first period of a 6-3 home loss.

He cleared Friday and was assigned to the Hartford Wolf Pack, Sportsnet reported. The same wire carried Buffalo waiving defenceman Jack Rathbone, while Columbus’s Emil Andrae and forward Danton Heinen cleared after being placed on waivers Wednesday afternoon.

Table of Contents

Reimer On Waivers: Roster Math, Not A Career Verdict

Reimer has appeared in 540 NHL games across nine franchises, from Toronto — which drafted him in the fourth round in 2006 — through San Jose, Florida, Carolina, Detroit, Buffalo, Anaheim, Ottawa and now New York. His most recent extended workload came with the Sabres in 2024-25: 22 games, a 10-8-2 record, a .901 save percentage and a 2.90 goals-against average, per Yahoo Sports. Buffalo declined to re-sign him.

That record explains the signing and the waiver both. New York was not shopping for a starter on Oct. 25. It was shopping for a body who could absorb a night and buy Dylan Garand a rest. Reimer got that night, faced eight shots, and the audition closed.

The timing of Reimer on waivers lines up almost exactly with Joonas Korpisalo’s rehab calendar, which is the part that actually matters to the standings.

The Goaltending Chain That Sets The Rangers’ Playoff Line

The Rangers’ crease has been a chain of contingencies since the first week of the season. New York acquired Korpisalo from Boston in the off-season to back up Shesterkin. Korpisalo then went down — TSN reports a foot infection, while Sportsnet and ESPN describe a lower-body injury — and Garand, who had cleared waivers before opening night specifically so he could play regularly in the AHL, was recalled and promoted again when Shesterkin was lost.

The result is the number set that decides New York’s season. In his first six games, Garand posted a 1.85 goals-against average and a .929 save percentage. In his past five, those figures are 3.50 and .877. He has started 11 consecutive games.

That is not a slump so much as an arithmetic problem. Eleven straight starts for a goaltender who was ticketed for the Wolf Pack in October is a workload no one planned for, and the five-game erosion tracks the workload rather than contradicting it. Nothing in the official availability reporting frames Garand as injured; the recorded facts are simply starts and saves.

Korpisalo’s rehab start offers the counterweight. He stopped 34 of 37 shots for Hartford in a 4-2 loss to Hershey on Wednesday night. Head coach Mike Sullivan confirmed earlier Thursday that Korpisalo will have a chance to join the team on its upcoming road trip through Seattle and Western Canada.

What The Waiver Wire Cannot Tell You About The Playoff Race

Specifics are where this story gets thin. The available reporting does not include the Rangers’ current point total, their wild-card gap, their regulation-wins or ROW tiebreaker figures, or games in hand on the teams around them. Any claim about exactly where New York sits relative to the playoff line would be invention, not analysis. The verifiable claim is narrower and still useful: a team that has started one goaltender 11 games running is managing its season one night at a time, and the standings will reflect that before they reflect any waiver decision.

The broader wire reinforces how routine these moves are. Columbus cycled Andrae and Heinen through waivers Wednesday and kept both in the organization. Buffalo waived Rathbone, 27, who never appeared in a game for the Sabres; his last NHL action came in 2022-23 with Vancouver, 11 games, one goal and one assist. Depth churn of this kind rarely moves a playoff line on its own. It moves one when a team has no margin, which is the Rangers’ situation.

Who Makes It, And What The Reimer Decision Reveals

The Rangers make the postseason if two conditions hold: Korpisalo returns from the foot injury at something close to the level that made Boston的使用 of him viable, and Garand’s first-six form proves closer to his true performance level than his past-five. Neither condition is guaranteed. Both are measurable, which is the difference between a forecast and a hope.

If Korpisalo’s return slips, New York is back to one goaltender and a waiver claim. If it holds, Reimer on waivers becomes a footnote in a season defined by Shesterkin’s knee.

Either way, the transaction itself is not the story. The story is that a 38-year-old veteran with 540 games on his résumé was signed, started once, and moved off the roster in under two weeks because a team with playoff expectations could not afford to carry an unknown in the crease. That is what the standings pressure looks like from the inside — not a headline, a waiver wire entry on a Thursday.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Rangers put James Reimer on waivers?

New York signed Reimer to a one-year, $850,000 deal on Oct. 25 for goaltending depth after Igor Shesterkin’s season-ending knee surgery. Reimer allowed three goals on eight shots in his only start, and Joonas Korpisalo’s nearing return from a foot infection removed the need for a third goaltender. Reimer cleared waivers Friday and was assigned to the AHL’s Hartford Wolf Pack.

How has Dylan Garand performed since taking over the Rangers’ crease?

Garand posted a 1.85 goals-against average and .929 save percentage across his first six games. In his past five, those figures are 3.50 and .877. He has started 11 consecutive games.

What does the Reimer on waivers move mean for the playoff race?

It signals that Korpisalo is close to returning, which stabilizes a crease that has relied on one goaltender for 11 straight starts. The available reporting does not include the Rangers’ point total or wild-card gap, so any specific projection of their standing would be unverified.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for Reimer on waivers and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – Rangers Put Reimer on Waivers After One Start In Net, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA:

About James Williams

James Williams is the Content Director at AfriLatest. With a background in journalism and a love for storytelling, he curates compelling content and multimedia that resonates with global readers. James is dedicated to maintaining AfriLatest as a trusted source for daily news, sports updates, and entertainment trends.

View all articles by James Williams

Up Next

Bronny James NBA Future: Lakers Roster Math Turns Tight

Don't Miss

Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds To Reassess Russia Stance

Click to comment

Sports

Bronny James NBA Future: Lakers Roster Math Turns Tight

Bronny James’ NBA future is now a roster-math question in Los Angeles, not a development one. What the G League move confirms, and what remains rumor.

Published

14 hours ago

November 7, 2026

James Williams

Bronny James NBA Future: Lakers Roster Math Turns Tight

The scouting report has not changed in three years. Bronny James is a 6-foot-2, 210-pound guard whose calling card is defense, and CBS Sports states it plainly: he “has always been a defense-first player.”

That label is the entire case for keeping him. It is also, quietly, the case against him lasting. A defensive specialist who cannot guard up a position needs an offense that survives without him and a coaching staff willing to spend real minutes on development. In Los Angeles this season, neither condition holds. That, more than any single performance, is why the Bronny James NBA future is now a live question rather than background noise.

The confirmed fact is narrow. On Thursday, Nov. 5, the Lakers assigned James and rookie Cameron Carr to the Coachella Valley Lakers, their relocated G League affiliate. James appeared on the injury report as “out” for Friday’s NBA Cup game against Portland despite carrying no injury designation; his listed status is G League assignment. That is official team business, not speculation.

Why The Bronny James NBA Future Is A Roster-Math Problem

Separate the noise from the structure. LeBron James is now with the Philadelphia 76ers, who own the league’s best record at 8-1. The Lakers sit at 7-2. Both teams are fine. The separation that once gave the younger James a reason to be on the roster has been fully unwound, and the team did not collapse without it.

That matters because development minutes are a currency contenders hoard. Coach JJ Redick spent his after serving a warning on Nov. 1, when Los Angeles led Toronto 124-109 with 1:24 left and nearly lost the cushion. Toronto’s pressure forced the regulars back in with 43.7 seconds remaining. EssentiallySports reports James was among the reserves caught in that sequence, with an inbounds turnover among the errors.

Redick’s response was collective, not personal: “I won’t make that mistake again. I’ll leave the guys in. You got to play to the final buzzer, and if guys are not ready to play, then I just won’t put them in.” Read correctly, that is a rotation policy statement. It ends the era of emptying the bench early. For a player whose minutes came almost exclusively in decided games, the practical effect is severe.

The G League Numbers That Cut Both Ways

James has produced at that level. Across 25 games in his first two seasons with the affiliate formerly known as the South Bay Lakers, he averaged 18.4 points on 49.6% shooting, including 41.3% from three, plus 4.4 assists and 4.0 rebounds. The team now plays home games at Acrisure Arena in Palm Desert rather than at the Lakers’ practice facility in El Segundo.

Those numbers are real and they are also a measurement of something the NBA does not need from him. Volume on-ball scoring in the G League does not convert into a 2.4-minute end-of-bench role. The NBA sample this season is five appearances, 0.8 points, 0.2 blocks, and zero assists or rebounds. His career line across 74 games is 2.5 points, 0.6 rebounds, one assist and 0.4 steals in 7.7 minutes on 37.8/34.4/81 splits.

Preseason offered the clearest read. James shot 4 of 16 from the field. Redick, in October: “I thought he had a really nice September and a good summer with us, but I don’t think he’s played well in the four preseason games.”

Contract, Trade Rumors And The Line Between Them

The financial picture is documented. James is on $2.3 million this season with a $2.5 million team option for next year, per Yahoo Sports and HEAVY. CBS frames the same deal as guaranteed through this season and not beyond. The two descriptions agree in substance; the option language is the more precise version.

Everything past that is rumor and should be labeled as such. James has been mentioned as a trade candidate and as a waive candidate if the Lakers add help in free agency or the buyout market. Team reporter Jovan Buha, discussing the need for a backup center, said: “So Bronny is the one who’s only making a couple million that they could potentially waive.” Reports that Los Angeles wants a roster upgrade are unconfirmed in detail. No trade has been agreed. No waiver has been filed.

The Knecht comparison circulating online deserves a caveat. Dalton Knecht was waived to reach 15 players, then signed a two-way deal with New York and scored 10 points in 16 minutes against Chicago. James has four points in 12 minutes across five games. The gap is stark, but it compares a player in a live rotation role to one in garbage time, and small samples mislead.

One detail worth flagging for accuracy: People lists James as the 55th pick in 2024, while HEAVY and Yahoo list 54th. Basic facts in this story get repeated without checking, which is a reason to treat the louder claims about his career with equal caution.

What Comes Next For A 22-Year-Old With A Team Option

The Coachella Valley Lakers open Friday, Nov. 6, against the Salt Lake City Stars in Palm Desert, at the same hour the Lakers tip against Portland at 7 pm PST on Amazon Prime Video. That is a 4 am start in Lagos, and for Nigerian and international audiences who follow players more than rosters, the split screen is the story: the father’s former team chasing a Cup win, the son chasing minutes two hours east.

Coachella Valley also plays Monday and Tuesday. Whether James stays down or returns is undetermined, and the team has not said. A strong G League stretch buys time; it does not buy a rotation spot. The Christmas Day meeting between the 76ers and Lakers will pull the family narrative back into focus regardless of where he is playing.

The honest read is that the Bronny James NBA future now hinges on whether he can add an NBA skill that survives contact with a real rotation, not on whether he can score 20 in the G League. The defense-first identity that got him here is not enough at 6-foot-2. Until that changes, the roster math in Los Angeles will keep pointing the same direction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bronny James playing for the Lakers against the Trail Blazers?

No. He was assigned to the Coachella Valley Lakers on Thursday, Nov. 5, and is listed as out on the injury report with a G League assignment designation rather than an injury.

What are the terms of Bronny James’ Lakers contract?

He is on $2.3 million this season with a $2.5 million team option for next year, according to Yahoo Sports and HEAVY. CBS Sports describes the deal as guaranteed through this season and not guaranteed afterward.

Has Bronny James been traded or waived?

No. He has been mentioned as a possible trade or waive candidate by reporters discussing the Lakers’ roster needs, but no transaction has been completed or announced.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for Bronny James NBA future and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – Bronny James NBA Future: Lakers Roster Math Turns Tight, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA:

About James Williams

View all articles by James Williams

Sports

Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds To Reassess Russia Stance

Škoda, main sponsor of ice hockey worlds, will reassess its involvement if Russia plays the 2027 tournament in Germany as the IIHF weighs a CAS ruling.

Published

4 days ago

November 4, 2026

James Williams

Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds To Reassess Russia Stance

Škoda Auto’s most consequential move as the main sponsor of ice hockey worlds was never a cheque. It was a warning. In 2021 the Czech automaker said it would withdraw its backing of the championship if Belarus stayed on as co-host alongside Latvia. The IIHF stripped Belarus of the hosting rights, and the tournament was played in Latvia alone.

The company is running the same play again. On Wednesday, Škoda said it would “reassess” its involvement in the men’s world championship if Russia is allowed to compete, describing a Russian return as “incompatible with the values we have consistently upheld.”

The trigger is a Court of Arbitration for Sport ruling last week that obliged the IIHF to lift its exclusion of Russian national teams, in place since 2022 over the war in Ukraine. The case followed an appeal by the Russian Ice Hockey Federation. The IIHF said the practical impact of that ruling was “significantly underestimated” and that it is still deciding how to respond.

Why The Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds Has Credibility Here

Škoda is not a logo leased for a fortnight. It has backed the flagship event since 1992 as a mobility partner and has held the title of Official Main Sponsor since 1993, a run of 33 consecutive years that the company documents itself in its official sponsorship releases. Its imprint is operational, not just financial: 53 all-electric Elroq and Enyaq vehicles supplied to organisers for the 2026 tournament in Zurich and Fribourg, plus a Most Valuable Player trophy of hand-blown Czech crystal produced by Lasvit and designed in-house.

The money is the one number nobody will attach to it. Škoda spokeswoman Ivana Povolna declined to specify the annual spend when asked by AFP. The company’s 2025 annual report quantifies the relationship in hardware, listing 45 electric cars lent to organisers, and in design work on the MVP trophy.

That asymmetry matters for how the threat should be read. The pressure is reputational and logistical, not a figure an auditor can check. What is established: Škoda has stated a conditional reassessment. What is analysis, not fact: whether a withdrawal would hurt the IIHF more than it hurts Škoda. Neither side has published a contract term.

What The Verified Record Says About Sponsor Pressure

Škoda is not alone, and the queue formed quickly. Workwear maker Strauss will “forgo all logo exposure associated with the tournament” and is “considering withdrawing as a sponsor,” CEO Henning Strauss said. Nokian Tyres said it would end its backing if Russia takes part. AJ Products, a tournament sponsor since 1989, asked for its logo not to be shown.

The national federations moved first. Finland, Sweden, Czechia, Norway, Denmark and Latvia have said they will play the tournament but not games against Russia, a boycott Al Jazeera tracked as it spread. Austria became the seventh late Tuesday; its federation CEO Alexander Helwig told broadcaster ORF that “as of now, we would certainly not play against Russia,” per ESPN.

Seven of 16 nations is not a fringe position. It is close to half the field refusing a fixture. Canada extended the pressure beyond the senior tournament: Prime Minister Mark Carney said Russia and Belarus will be barred from the World Junior Championship in Alberta beginning December 26. Russian ambassador Oleg Stepanov told TASS that Canada was “bringing politics even into junior hockey.” The Finnish city of Turku has threatened to drop hosting duties for the 2028 World Junior Championship.

The IIHF’s own language concedes the squeeze. It cited “visa and entry requirements, security provisions, logistical constraints and consequences for competition formats, all compounded by the limited time available, with some events only weeks away.”

The Format Problem That Makes Hockey Different From Football

Hockey’s top division has no qualifying route that can absorb a late entrant. The championship runs 16 teams in two groups of eight, with the two weakest relegated each year. The 2027 groups in Germany have already been drawn without Russia: Group A holds Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Latvia, Slovenia and Ukraine; Group B holds Canada, the United States, Czechia, Slovakia, Denmark, Norway, Hungary and Kazakhstan, per Nasha Niva’s breakdown of the field.

Russia would therefore enter as a ninth team in a group, or displace a qualifier such as Ukraine or Kazakhstan. That is the “consequences for competition formats” the IIHF pointed to. It is a scheduling problem in a way that a European football qualifying group is not.

Russian Sports Minister Mikhail Degtyarev said via TASS that he expected Russia to be awarded wins if nations forfeit. That is a stated expectation, not a confirmed rule. The source material contains no IIHF competition regulation establishing that forfeited games would be recorded as Russian victories, and the federation has not said so publicly.

Contract Status: Reassess Is Not Withdraw

Škoda’s wording is conditional. “If the Russian national team takes part in the tournament, we will reassess our involvement in the tournament and take further action” is not a termination notice. Strauss sits closer to a partial exit. Nokian Tyres stated an outright end to backing. Three gradations of one pressure campaign, and none of them a signed withdrawal.

The IIHF said it is “carefully analyzing the scenarios” and remains in dialogue with national associations, host authorities and organisers.

Future Outlook For The Tournament And Its Backers

The decision point lands before May. The IIHF must reconcile a CAS ruling it disagrees with, a 16-team field already drawn, and a bloc of hosts and sponsors that has publicly set terms. For the main sponsor of ice hockey worlds, the 2021 Belarus precedent is the relevant one: a public conditional threat, then a federation decision that removed the objection. Whether that sequence repeats in Germany depends on a scenario analysis the IIHF has not published, and on a contract value Škoda has never disclosed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will Škoda definitely withdraw as main sponsor of the ice hockey worlds?

No. Škoda said it would “reassess” its involvement and “take further action” if Russia plays. That is conditional language, not a termination. Spokeswoman Ivana Povolna also declined to specify how much the company spends annually on the tournament.

Why is Russia eligible for IIHF events again?

A Court of Arbitration for Sport ruling last week obliged the IIHF to lift its exclusion of Russian national teams, which had been in place since 2022 over the war in Ukraine. The case followed an appeal by the Russian Ice Hockey Federation. The IIHF has said it disagrees with the outcome and is still deciding how to react.

Which countries are refusing to play Russia at the men’s world championship?

Finland, Sweden, Czechia, Norway, Denmark, Latvia and Austria have all said they will not play games against Russia. That is seven of the 16 nations in the top division. Canada has separately barred Russia and Belarus from the World Junior Championship in Alberta.

Can Russia simply be added to the 2027 tournament in Germany?

Not without a format change. The 16 teams are split into two groups of eight and the 2027 groups have already been drawn without Russia. Russia would have to enter as a ninth team in a group or displace a qualifier such as Ukraine or Kazakhstan.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for main sponsor of ice hockey worlds and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – Main Sponsor Of Ice Hockey Worlds To Reassess Russia Stance, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA:

About James Williams

View all articles by James Williams

Football

AFCON Two-Year Cycle Restored: What CAF’s U-Turn Means

CAF has restored the AFCON two-year cycle after a unanimous EXCO vote. The money, the calendar gaps, and what it means for Nigeria and Africa.

Published

1 week ago

October 31, 2026

James Williams

AFCON Two-Year Cycle Restored: What CAF's U-Turn Means

The Confederation of African Football has restored the AFCON two-year cycle, less than a year after announcing it would abandon it. The CAF Executive Committee approved the reversal unanimously, and president Patrice Motsepe confirmed the decision on Thursday, 29 October 2026, after the confederation’s Strategy Conference in Cabo Verde on 7–9 October.

The principals are not two clubs and an agent. They are CAF, its 54 member associations, and — by CAF’s own account — the African players employed by clubs outside the continent. The 2027 TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations stays with Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.

Why CAF Reversed Course On The AFCON Two-Year Cycle

AFCON two-year cycle

The stated reason is the timing of money, not nostalgia. CAF had planned an Africa Nations League to run every two years and replace AFCON, which it intended to move to a four-year schedule. That plan was announced in December 2025.

By October, CAF’s assessment had changed. The confederation concluded the Nations League would need several years before it could generate the resources to make African football’s competitions globally competitive and financially self-sustaining.

Motsepe’s explanation, published on CAF’s website, put the member associations at the centre: “The decision by the CAF EXCO that the CAF AFCON should take place every Two Years was based on advancing, protecting and promoting the interest of African Football and CAF’s 54 Member Associations, as well as the interest of African players employed by Football Clubs outside Africa.

He added: “We were also concerned by the several years required before the proposed new Africa Nations League Pan-African competition … could make the substantial financial and football development contributions for African Football and CAF competitions to be globally competitive and self-supporting.” The announcement was carried by Punch alongside CAF’s own statement.

The Money Question CAF Would Not Defer

Read plainly, the reversal is a hedging decision. AFCON is a revenue engine that exists now. The Nations League was a bet on revenue that would arrive later. CAF chose to keep the engine running while leaving the bet on the table.

That matters because the four-year plan had high-level backing. FIFA president Gianni Infantino urged CAF to move AFCON to a four-year cycle in early 2020, and in December 2025 Motsepe announced exactly that, as ESPN reported. CAF this week also reaffirmed its support for Infantino despite outcry over botched plans for a FIFA commercial subsidiary managed with private investors. The reversal is therefore a rare case of CAF setting its calendar against the stated preference of the FIFA president.

What The Published Calendar Actually Says

The restored biennial format, as published, does not produce a two-yearly tournament. CAF’s confirmed editions are 2027, 2028, 2031 and 2033. The step from 2028 to 2031 is three years.

CAF’s justification is the World Cup. In line with FIFA tradition, continental national-team finals should not fall in a World Cup year, and the 2030 tournament is the constraint. Morocco World News noted that the announced dates mean some editions will be separated by three years despite the biennial label.

This is the part of the story that changes how the decision should be read. The guarantee CAF has given its members is not a fixed two-year rhythm. It is a fixture list in which the gaps are dictated by FIFA’s calendar.

What It Means For Nigeria And The Super Eagles

AFCON two-year cycle

For Nigeria, the gain is structural rather than immediate. A flagship continental finals retained on the calendar keeps qualifying windows, broadcast inventory and sponsorship value in place — the assets the Nigeria Football Federation plans around. A four-year AFCON would have thinned all three while the Nations League found its feet.

The 2027 host arrangement is the other variable. Motsepe said he was confident Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda would deliver, while acknowledging problems in venue preparations that he said would be addressed. His reference point was Cameroon, the 2021 host that was widely doubted before the tournament and, in his account, delivered.

The unsigned element is 2028. The bidding process for that edition is underway, according to ESPN’s reporting, which means the second instalment of the restored cycle currently has no host. Nothing about that is complete, and it should not be described as settled.

How Likely Is The AFCON Two-Year Cycle To Hold?

Near-term, close to certain. The vote was unanimous, the announcement is official, and the decision protects CAF’s most bankable asset. Nothing in the current record supports a second reversal before 2028.

Medium-term, less settled. The Nations League has been demoted, not cancelled, and the 2028 host is unresolved. If a future CAF leadership revisits the Nations League as a revenue source, the four-year argument returns with it. That is speculation and should be labelled as such — no source in CAF’s statement points to a renewed review.

Read as a business decision, the AFCON two-year cycle is CAF buying time: keeping the tournament that pays for African football while it waits to see whether a replacement can ever pay for itself. For Nigeria and the other 53 member associations, the practical instruction is to plan qualifying and squad cycles against published dates, not against the word biennial.

Frequently Asked Questions

When is the next Africa Cup of Nations?

The next TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations is scheduled for 2027, hosted jointly by Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. CAF has confirmed subsequent editions for 2028, 2031 and 2033.

Does the two-year cycle mean AFCON is played every two years without exception?

No. The published editions are 2027, 2028, 2031 and 2033. CAF says continental national-team finals should not be staged in a World Cup year, and the 2030 World Cup creates a three-year gap between the 2028 and 2031 tournaments.

Why did CAF reverse its four-year AFCON plan?

CAF said the proposed Africa Nations League, which was meant to run every two years as a replacement, would take several years to generate the money needed to make its competitions globally competitive and financially self-sustaining. The Executive Committee voted unanimously to keep AFCON biennial.

Follow AFRILATEST on Google News

Receive alerts for AFCON two-year cycle and more like it.

FIRST TIME REACTIONS:

Be the first to leave us a comment – AFCON Two-Year Cycle Restored: What CAF’s U-Turn Means, down the comment section.

JOIN US ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA: